Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

Gain and Bandwidth - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement


Qacer
Post subject: Gain and bandwidth
Unread postPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:11 am
Offline
Captain

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17
Location: Tampa, FL
Hi all,

I was just reading the Pozar book and on p.553 it mentions that "it is preferable to design for less than the maximum obtainable gain to improve bandwidth."

Is there a formal derivation to this statement? I'm curious why.

Thanks!


Top
Profile

Jeanalmira
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:25 am
Offline
General
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 65
Location: Singapore
Hi,

I think it's related to this condition "Gain-Bandwidth is equal to constant", which derived from Bode-Fano Theorem.

Therefore, by designing for less than the maximum obtainable gain, wider bandwidth will be obtained.

Thanks and Regards,
Jean


Top
Profile

Guest
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Mon May 02, 2005 1:30 pm

The last post is absolutly correct. Fanos limit shows that for wider bandwidth, the gain will be reduced.


Top


Guest
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Tue May 03, 2005 8:49 am

Aint Bode-Fano's criterion showing the VSWR-bandwidth product that a matching network can have for a given quality factor mostly for passive devices shuch as antenas?

I always had the impession that remplacing VSWR by GAIN was an oversimplification. In my mind it only work as stated if the device in unilateral.

Second, what is this GAIN-Bandwitdh tradeoff? What gain? A flat gain or the Maximum available gain over frequency, whatever value or rolloff it shows?

Very often people will design matching network to autocompensate the gain rolloff and obtain a flat response, by sacrificing the VSWR.

I see Bode-Fano as a good starting point to sea if a matching is feasable.


Top


Guest
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Tue May 03, 2005 11:43 am

You are correct , it is a criterion for passive networks. The matching networks are passive, therfore, the wider the bandwidth the higher the loss, hence lower gain.



Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Webmaster:
Kirt Blattenberger,
 BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:
 AirplanesAndRockets.com

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

height-line