Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

Differential Bandpass Filter Design - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement


aron_coop
Post subject: Differential Bandpass Filter Design
Unread postPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 12:02 pm
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 11:35 am
Posts: 1
I am tring to design a differential BPF to be used in a grad school project. It's suppose to have a bandwidth of 5.2Ghz to 5.9Ghz, less than 1dB of loss, Input/output match less than -10dB and have more than 30dB's of rejection for the bands 2Ghz-2.5Ghz and 10Ghz-12Ghz.

I used the basic "T" equations to get my L and C values, athen built a Low-pass and a High-pass and cascaded them. To get the 30dB rejection I have to add additional stages on the Low-pass and High-pass filters. However, when I do this the bandwidth widens out to be greater than 5.2Ghz-5.9Ghz. Does anyone know why this is happening? And how can I correct this?

Can some please help or advise.

Also, here the equaltions that I used. They are for a "T" section, but I think they should work for a differential with some changes to the cap (take half the value) between the inductors for a LPF or to the inductor (double the value) between the caps on a HPF.

EQUATIONS:
LPF:
Fh=5.8Ghz, Fc=11.6Ghz, Z0=50Ohms

C=1/(pi*Z0*Fc) = 1/(3.14*50*11.6e9) = 0.55pF
L=(Z0)^2 * C = (50^2)(0.55pF) = 1.37nH

HPF:
Fh=5.2Ghz, Fc=10.4Ghz, Z0=50Ohms

C=1/(pi*Z0*Fc) = 1/(3.14*50*10.4e9) = 0.612pF
L=(Z0)^2 * C = (50^2)(0.612pF) = 1.53nH


Does anyone know if these equations are correct for a Differential BPF? And is the assumption of Fc = 2 Fh correct for a Differntial Circuit or just for the "T" model?

Thanks,
Aron


Top
Profile

I.R
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 2:53 pm

Hi,

You will of course have to realize your filter with distributed elements. There are equations for transforming the capacitance and inductance values to physical dimensions of transmission lines. You can easily find these equations in a text book :idea:

The bandwidth can change because you change the characteristics of the filter when you add aditional sections. Do you take the Q element under consideration? You should use a design tool to synthesize your filter and by this you can save time and iterations.

I suggest Eagleware: This is a great design tool for distributed and lumped filters with synthesis and simulation capabilities.
The equations for the 'T' sections are:

LPF:

L=Zo/pi*fc
C=1/pi*Zo*fc

HPF:

L=Zo/4*pi*fc
C=1/4*pi*Zo*fc


When you realize the filter with transmission lines (micro-strip or another), you will have to define the substrate and from that to derive few properties: Er (the dielectric coefficient), Loss tangent, resisitivity etc... you will have to define those and consider them in your final stage of design in order to match to the filter's requirements.

I suggest you will use Rogers laminates 4350 or similar as the substrate due to its relatively low Er and stable characteristics.


Top


moe
Post subject: check out this web site
Unread postPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:38 pm

http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/ap ... /791/ln/en


Top


Pi
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed May 05, 2004 3:40 pm

there is an furmula. You can find out how many resonators you need for defined bandwith. What i can see these days, the engineers use software as crutches. Take a tea, switch off the computer, and start thinking. Purely theoretically. In my times we asked professor for consultation.

If you add additional 50 resonators, it might be even wider.


Top


to moe
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed May 05, 2004 3:50 pm

some Maxim's appnotes are good. But only some. Maxim never was wireless company and therefore the datasheets are full of mistakes.
e.g. The don't know location of minimum noise figure impedance and s-parameters. They measure only IP2 to come up with +56dBm IP2 for LNAs and similar stuff..



Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Webmaster:
Kirt Blattenberger,
 BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:
 AirplanesAndRockets.com

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

height-line