Homepage - RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger | KB3UON | Sitemap | ©1996-2014     Visit RF Cafe on
      Menu below is just a small sample of what is here!          Visit RF Cafe on Facebook Visit RF Cafe on Twitter Visit RF Cafe on LinkedIn
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<

Differential Bandpass Filter Design - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.


aron_coop
Post subject: Differential Bandpass Filter Design
Unread postPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 12:02 pm
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 11:35 am
Posts: 1
I am tring to design a differential BPF to be used in a grad school project. It's suppose to have a bandwidth of 5.2Ghz to 5.9Ghz, less than 1dB of loss, Input/output match less than -10dB and have more than 30dB's of rejection for the bands 2Ghz-2.5Ghz and 10Ghz-12Ghz.

I used the basic "T" equations to get my L and C values, athen built a Low-pass and a High-pass and cascaded them. To get the 30dB rejection I have to add additional stages on the Low-pass and High-pass filters. However, when I do this the bandwidth widens out to be greater than 5.2Ghz-5.9Ghz. Does anyone know why this is happening? And how can I correct this?

Can some please help or advise.

Also, here the equaltions that I used. They are for a "T" section, but I think they should work for a differential with some changes to the cap (take half the value) between the inductors for a LPF or to the inductor (double the value) between the caps on a HPF.

EQUATIONS:
LPF:
Fh=5.8Ghz, Fc=11.6Ghz, Z0=50Ohms

C=1/(pi*Z0*Fc) = 1/(3.14*50*11.6e9) = 0.55pF
L=(Z0)^2 * C = (50^2)(0.55pF) = 1.37nH

HPF:
Fh=5.2Ghz, Fc=10.4Ghz, Z0=50Ohms

C=1/(pi*Z0*Fc) = 1/(3.14*50*10.4e9) = 0.612pF
L=(Z0)^2 * C = (50^2)(0.612pF) = 1.53nH


Does anyone know if these equations are correct for a Differential BPF? And is the assumption of Fc = 2 Fh correct for a Differntial Circuit or just for the "T" model?

Thanks,
Aron


Top
Profile

I.R
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 2:53 pm

Hi,

You will of course have to realize your filter with distributed elements. There are equations for transforming the capacitance and inductance values to physical dimensions of transmission lines. You can easily find these equations in a text book :idea:

The bandwidth can change because you change the characteristics of the filter when you add aditional sections. Do you take the Q element under consideration? You should use a design tool to synthesize your filter and by this you can save time and iterations.

I suggest Eagleware: This is a great design tool for distributed and lumped filters with synthesis and simulation capabilities.
The equations for the 'T' sections are:

LPF:

L=Zo/pi*fc
C=1/pi*Zo*fc

HPF:

L=Zo/4*pi*fc
C=1/4*pi*Zo*fc


When you realize the filter with transmission lines (micro-strip or another), you will have to define the substrate and from that to derive few properties: Er (the dielectric coefficient), Loss tangent, resisitivity etc... you will have to define those and consider them in your final stage of design in order to match to the filter's requirements.

I suggest you will use Rogers laminates 4350 or similar as the substrate due to its relatively low Er and stable characteristics.


Top


moe
Post subject: check out this web site
Unread postPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:38 pm

http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/ap ... /791/ln/en


Top


Pi
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed May 05, 2004 3:40 pm

there is an furmula. You can find out how many resonators you need for defined bandwith. What i can see these days, the engineers use software as crutches. Take a tea, switch off the computer, and start thinking. Purely theoretically. In my times we asked professor for consultation.

If you add additional 50 resonators, it might be even wider.


Top


to moe
Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed May 05, 2004 3:50 pm

some Maxim's appnotes are good. But only some. Maxim never was wireless company and therefore the datasheets are full of mistakes.
e.g. The don't know location of minimum noise figure impedance and s-parameters. They measure only IP2 to come up with +56dBm IP2 for LNAs and similar stuff..



Posted  11/12/2012
A Disruptive Web Presence

Custom Search
Over 10,000 pages indexed! (none duped or pirated)

Read About RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger
    KB3UON

RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Workbook
RF Cascade Workbook is a very extensive system cascaded component Excel workbook that includes the standard Gain, NF, IP2, IP3, Psat calculations, input & output VSWR, noise BW, min/max tolerance, DC power cauculations, graphing of all RF parameters, and has a graphical block diagram tool. An extensive User's Guide is also included. - Only $35.
RF system analysis including
frequency conversion & filters

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

Product & Service Directory
Personally Selected Manufacturers
RF Cafe T-Shirts & Mugs

RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel
Your RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster
Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger... single-handedly redefining what an
                                 engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem! (Seize the Day!)

5CCG (5th MOB): My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website