Formulas & Data:
- Electronics
- Mathematics
- Physics
- RF & Microwaves

Parts Vendors:
- all hand-selected

- Amateur Radio
- Vintage Articles:
- Electronics World
- Popular Electronics
- QST
- Radio & TV News
- Radio Craft
- Short Wave Craft
- Wireless World

- Events Calendar
RF Cafe Homepage
Copyright 1999-2015   •−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •   "RF Cafe" in Morse Code  >> Listen to It <<
- EW & Radar Handbook
- Quizzes       - Software
- App Notes
- Calculators
- Advertise on RF Cafe
- About RF Cafe™
- RF Cafe Shirts & Mugs
- RF Cafe Archives
RF Cafe Book Contest
- RF Cafe on Visit RF Cafe on Facebook Visit RF Cafe on Twitter Visit RF Cafe on LinkedIn
- Tech Humor
- Forums Archive
- Job Board
- Donate to RF Cafe
- Kirt's Cogitations
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
Greetings: There is so much good stuff on RF Cafe that there is no way to list or link to all of it here. Please use the Search box or the Site Map to find what you want - there is a good chance I have it. Thanks!

CPW Calculation - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.


ljoseph
Post subject: CPW Calculation Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:16 pm

Captain


Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:54 am
Posts: 13
Location: Dallas
Hello
With the following parameters, I am getting different answers with different tools.
H = 0.3mm
Er = 4.25
W = 0.56mm
T= 32.5um
gap = 0.35mm
Freq 1842 Mhz

With this Agilent Appcad gives 50.2 ohms. AWR Tx line gives 47 ohms.
Following online calculator gives 78 ohms.
http://www1.sphere.ne.jp/i-lab/ilab/tool/cpw_e.htm

Don't understand the reason for this difference.


Top

Jeanalmira
Post subject: Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 3:01 am

General


Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 65
Location: Singapore
Hi ljoseph,

the difference is the ground plane.
I believe that for your first calculation (AppCad and AWR) you included the groundplane (CPW ground)
While the online calculator is without ground plane.

you can double check the setting thru AppCad and also AWR (CPW and CPW ground).

Hope it helps.

Regards,
Jean


Top

imodelit_moderator
Post subject: Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:40 am

Captain


Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:01 am
Posts: 22
Dear ljoseph,

I'm with Jeanalmira in his opinion. As for the lower impedance values you used -most probably- Grounded-Coplanar. While the larger values is for the conventional coplanar waveguide -without lower ground plane-.

Kindly check this online applet, it is for conventional coplanar waveguide.
http://imodelit.com/ViewDetails.aspx?AID=190 Thanks.

Best Regards,
imodelit Moderator







Posted  11/12/2012

Your RF Cafe
Progenitor & Webmaster

Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger… single-handedly redefining what an engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem!
(Seize the Day!)

5th MOB: My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website