Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

Better Driver, Worse System Performance??? - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement


lna
 Post subject: Better driver, worse system performance???
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:49 pm 
 
Captain

Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm looking for help for a PA design.

My project is a balanced 1W(average) OFDM PA at 600MHz, droven by a half watt class A driver. The original design is very close to system requirements, except marginal fail EVM, which I think caused by the driver. So I found a drop in replacement driver and evaluated it. With new match circuits, the new driver alone performancs very good--2dB higher P1dB and 1~2dB better EVM.

What confused me is that system EVM drop by 2~6dB!!

I don't think the driver change would impact the final stage because there is a 50ohm splitter between them.

Any idea???? Please.


 
   
 
IR
 Post subject: Re: Better driver, worse system performance???
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:06 pm 
 
Site Admin
 

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
I think that the problem is not within the driver.
The new driver which you tested proves that point.

If the problem is linearity - which seems to be based on the description you showed, then the problem lies within the balanced amplifier.

The significant stage for cascaded IP3 calculation is the last stage of the Tx chain.

(Same as the first stage for cascaded NF calculation).

Try to focus on the balanced amplifier and optimize it.

In many data sheets of power transistors, there are measured results for different signals.

--> Have you looked on what are the expected performance of the transistor (within the balanced amplifier) for the type of signal you are using (i.e. modulation type, filter applied, clipping etc).

It might be the case that you need to consider a final stage with more output power.

_________________
Best regards,

- IR





Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Webmaster:
Kirt Blattenberger,
 BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:
 AirplanesAndRockets.com

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

height-line