Formulas & Data:
- Electronics
- Mathematics
- Physics
- RF & Microwaves

Parts Vendors:
- all hand-selected

- Amateur Radio
- Vintage Articles:
- Electronics World
- Popular Electronics
- QST
- Radio & TV News
- Radio Craft
- Short Wave Craft
- Wireless World

- Events Calendar
RF Cafe Homepage
Copyright 1999-2015   •−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •   "RF Cafe" in Morse Code  >> Listen to It <<
- EW & Radar Handbook
- Quizzes       - Software
- App Notes
- Calculators
- Advertise on RF Cafe
- About RF Cafe™
- RF Cafe Shirts & Mugs
- RF Cafe Archives
RF Cafe Book Contest
- RF Cafe on Visit RF Cafe on Facebook Visit RF Cafe on Twitter Visit RF Cafe on LinkedIn
- Tech Humor
- Forums Archive
- Job Board
- Donate to RF Cafe
- Kirt's Cogitations
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
Greetings: There is so much good stuff on RF Cafe that there is no way to list or link to all of it here. Please use the Search box or the Site Map to find what you want - there is a good chance I have it here. Thanks!

Better driver, worse system performance??? - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.


 Post subject: Better driver, worse system performance???
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:49 pm 
 
Captain

Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm looking for help for a PA design.

My project is a balanced 1W(average) OFDM PA at 600MHz, droven by a half watt class A driver. The original design is very close to system requirements, except marginal fail EVM, which I think caused by the driver. So I found a drop in replacement driver and evaluated it. With new match circuits, the new driver alone performancs very good--2dB higher P1dB and 1~2dB better EVM.

What confused me is that system EVM drop by 2~6dB!!

I don't think the driver change would impact the final stage because there is a 50ohm splitter between them.

Any idea???? Please.


 
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Better driver, worse system performance???
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:06 pm 
 
Site Admin
 

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
I think that the problem is not within the driver.
The new driver which you tested proves that point.

If the problem is linearity - which seems to be based on the description you showed, then the problem lies within the balanced amplifier.

The significant stage for cascaded IP3 calculation is the last stage of the Tx chain.

(Same as the first stage for cascaded NF calculation).

Try to focus on the balanced amplifier and optimize it.

In many data sheets of power transistors, there are measured results for different signals.

--> Have you looked on what are the expected performance of the transistor (within the balanced amplifier) for the type of signal you are using (i.e. modulation type, filter applied, clipping etc).

It might be the case that you need to consider a final stage with more output power.

_________________
Best regards,

- IR





Posted  11/12/2012

Your RF Cafe
Progenitor & Webmaster

Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger… single-handedly redefining what an engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem!
(Seize the Day!)

5th MOB: My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website