Custom Search
Over 10000 Pages Indexed
Your Host
Click here to read about RF CafeKirt
Blattenberger

... single-
handedly
redefining
what an
engineering website
should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem!
(Seize the Day!)

5CCG (5th MOB):
My USAF radar shop

Hobby & Fun

Airplanes and Rockets:
My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom:
My daughter Sally's horse
riding business website -
lots of info

•−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •
RF Cafe Morse Code >Hear It<

Job Board

About RF Cafe©

RF Cafe E-Mail

Better driver, worse system performance??? - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.


 Post subject: Better driver, worse system performance???
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:49 pm 
 
Captain

Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm looking for help for a PA design.

My project is a balanced 1W(average) OFDM PA at 600MHz, droven by a half watt class A driver. The original design is very close to system requirements, except marginal fail EVM, which I think caused by the driver. So I found a drop in replacement driver and evaluated it. With new match circuits, the new driver alone performancs very good--2dB higher P1dB and 1~2dB better EVM.

What confused me is that system EVM drop by 2~6dB!!

I don't think the driver change would impact the final stage because there is a 50ohm splitter between them.

Any idea???? Please.


 
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Better driver, worse system performance???
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:06 pm 
 
Site Admin
 

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Germany
I think that the problem is not within the driver.
The new driver which you tested proves that point.

If the problem is linearity - which seems to be based on the description you showed, then the problem lies within the balanced amplifier.

The significant stage for cascaded IP3 calculation is the last stage of the Tx chain.

(Same as the first stage for cascaded NF calculation).

Try to focus on the balanced amplifier and optimize it.

In many data sheets of power transistors, there are measured results for different signals.

--> Have you looked on what are the expected performance of the transistor (within the balanced amplifier) for the type of signal you are using (i.e. modulation type, filter applied, clipping etc).

It might be the case that you need to consider a final stage with more output power.

_________________
Best regards,

- IR





Posted  11/12/2012
A Disruptive Web Presence

Custom Search
Over 10,000 pages indexed! (none duped or pirated)

Read About RF Cafe
Webmaster: Kirt Blattenberger
    KB3UON

RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Workbook
RF Cascade Workbook is a very extensive system cascaded component Excel workbook that includes the standard Gain, NF, IP2, IP3, Psat calculations, input & output VSWR, noise BW, min/max tolerance, DC power cauculations, graphing of all RF parameters, and has a graphical block diagram tool. An extensive User's Guide is also included. - Only $35.
RF system analysis including
frequency conversion & filters

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

Product & Service Directory
Personally Selected Manufacturers
RF Cafe T-Shirts & Mugs

RF Cafe Software

Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel