Thank you for visiting RF Cafe! Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!


The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement

Post subject: Best solution for RF protection Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:13 pm


Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:40 am
Posts: 14
I've got a specification that allows as much as +20 dBm into a receive input but many LNAs can't take that much power without ruining the amplifier. Is there some kind of diode circuit that can be used for protection against such a RF input without creating distortion at a reasonably lower level? My input is relatively low frequency (1-30 MHz...HF).




Post subject: Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:18 am


Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:40 am
Posts: 14
Anyone have any ideas?




Post subject: Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:47 pm


Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Posts: 218
Location: London UK
There are one or two bits of data missing before I can get my addled head around this one.
Is the frequency of the +20dBm signal very close to weaker signals you are trying to detect/decode? And is it at a fixed frequency or anywhere in the range?
Is the +20dBm signal pulsed or continuous?
Are the weaker signals spread over a random spectrum from 1-30MHz?
I would certainly look around for bomb-proof front-end amplifiers, such as the approach using transmit transistors with a measured and adequately low noise factor as the first stage. This approach has been shown to yield very high IP3 figures.

At bottom, life is all about
Sucking in and blowing out.


Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:58 pm


Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:40 am
Posts: 14
The frequency is anywhere in the 1-30 MHz range. This is NOT a performance spec so much as it is a "damage" spec. Another words we don't have to receive anything in particular while this is going on.

I think the damage spec is "continuous".

The one thing that is tough here is that most gain block amps I see have absolute max inputs no more than +18 dBm (most MiniCircuits amps have +13 dBm). It's hard enough just finding an amp that will work in this range anymore (due to most focus on the higher ranges) let alone an absolute max this high. Therefore some sort of circuitry is needed.


Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Kirt Blattenberger,

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !