Thank you for visiting RF Cafe! Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums RF Cafe Homepage Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

Analytical Parasitic Estimation - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement


Camelot
Post subject: Analytical parasitic estimation Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 9:26 am

Captain

Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:36 am
Posts: 7
Hello,
I hope it is not a too much weird question…
We all know that if you have two metal layer with a distant d and thickness th1, th2, we could calculate the capacitance for area unit with C = (Er*Eo)/d. My question is, in order to get merely an estimation, does someone know if exists such as similar formula for calculating the capacitance for perimeter unit between the edge th1 of the first layer with the surface (with infinite extension) of the second?

Thank you very much!

Camelot


Top

nubbage
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 10:33 am

General


Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:07 pm
Posts: 218
Location: London UK
Hi camelot
I suspect that the structure you are enquiring about is the structure that actually makes the formula value of C = the measured value of C.
The classic formula assumes the electric field is perpendicular to the plane of the plates. Without the device you seem to be mentioning, the field at the edge of both plates actually curves outwards before returning to the plates. In consequence the formula in that case does not predict an accurate answer corresponding to what you will measure with a bridge.
The extra plate is called a fringing plate (I think) and is always used for constructing a standard reference capacitor. It has the effect of restoring parallelism to the E field between the plates, a situation for which the formula is valid.






Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Webmaster:
Kirt Blattenberger,
 BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:
 AirplanesAndRockets.com

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

height-line