Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Calculators Education Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Wireless System Designer RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Search RF Cafe Sitemap Advertising Facebook RF Cafe Forums Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

4 Layer PCB: Third Layer?! - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Original posts:

Amateur Radio | Antennas | Circuits & Components | Systems | Test & Measurement


JZ
Post subject: 4 layer PCB: third layer?! Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:40 am

Lieutenant


Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:05 am
Posts: 1
Hello everybody,
I´m new to this forum and I hope you can help me with my question.
Acutally I´m desinging a rf-board with a 2.4ghz transceiver. I found some application notes from different suppliers and I found some differences regarding the layer build up of a four-layer-pcb:
- The first and fourth layer are almost everytime used for routing with covering copper (connected to ground) at the remaining space.
- The second layer is complete ground.
- Regarding the third layer I found a difference: One company suggests that the third layer is used for power routing and covering the remaining space with copper connected to ground. Another suggestion is to add a complete copper-area connected to VCC.

Are there any experiences that you can share with me/us? Should one of the options should be prefered (why?)?


Top

yendori
Post subject: Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:03 pm

General


Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 1:19 am
Posts: 50
Location: texarcana
I've always been told to route layer 3 with power and pour the remaining area with copper ground. ( for RF boards )

Yendori


Top

rftroubleshooter
Post subject: Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:38 pm

Captain


Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:16 pm
Posts: 5
In the past, I would make the first inner layer a ground plane and the second layer a power plane. I do it different now, and I think that the new way is better.

On the first inner layer, I create small power planes under the RF chips. If I need to expand them a little to cover the bias inductors, I will. Then I connect these separate planes using 40 mil traces to a single trace outside of the RF area that provides power. This distributed power method ensures that I am able to isolate power supplies at RF to eliminate problems with spurious radiation, unwanted oscillation, tec.

The important part is to leave the area under the discrete components open for the most part on the first inner layer. The only other thing I would do on that layer is to put a small ground plane under the RF switch if there is one.

Then, on the second inner layer (or layer 3 as you call it), put a solid ground plane under all of the RF circuitry. Stitch it to the top layer ground connections liberally with vias. Then, on the bottom layer, pour a ground plane under the RF section so that it fills all of the area not occupied by other traces.

So why put the ground plane on layer 3 instead of 2, which is the common wisdom today? Well, the answer is parasitic capacitance. The layer stackup used by different board manufacturers varies widely from one to another. So the gap between the top layer and the layer 2 can be smaller than you intend. If it is too small, you will get unwanted capacitance to that big ground plane which will make tuning your TX and RX paths a pain. You can of course try to specify the buildup and hope your manufacturer complies. But as things continually move to China, you are dealing with an unknown there.

So I say why leave it to chance. By moving the ground plane to the 3rd layer, you ensure that parasitc capacitance for any common layer stackup won't be a problem. Your circuits will be easier to tune and will work better, and you will have less problems moving your product to China for manufacturing.

_________________
Steve Montgomery
http://www.rftroubleshooter.com







Posted  11/12/2012

RF Cafe Software

   Wireless System Designer - RF Cafe
Wireless System Designer

RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chart™ for Visio
Smith Chart™ for Excel

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe WebmasterCopyright
1996 - 2022
Webmaster:
Kirt Blattenberger,
 BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The Internet was still largely an unknown entity at the time and not much was available in the form of WYSIWYG ...

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website:
 AirplanesAndRockets.com

Try Using SEARCH
to Find What You Need. 
There are 1,000s of Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

height-line