Electronics World Cover,TOC,and list of posted Popular Electronics articles QST Radio & TV News Radio-Craft Radio-Electronics Short Wave Craft Wireless World About RF Cafe RF Cafe Homepage RF Cafe in Morse Code Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors Manufacturers & Services Consultants Engineer Jobs Twitter LinkedIn Advertise on RF Cafe! Engineering Books Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations Engineering Event Calendar Day in History RF Engineering Quizzes AN/MPN-14 Radar 5CCG Notable Quotes App Notes Bookstore Calculators Education Engineering Organizations Magazines Software,T-Shirts,Coffee Mugs Articles - submitted by RF Cafe visitors Simulators Technical Writings Advertisers Websites RF Cafe Archives Test Notes Slide Rules RF Cascade Workbook RF Stencils for Visio Shapes for Word Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!

RF Cafe Software

RF Cascade Worbook
 RF Cascade Workbook 2005 - RF Cafe
Calculator Workbook
RF Workbench
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Visio
Smith Chartâ„¢ for Excel
RF & EE Symbols Word
RF Stencils for Visio

Your RF Cafe
Progenitor & Webmaster

Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger
BSEE
KB3UON
EIEIO

Carpe Diem!
(Seize the Day!)

5th MOB:
My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets:
My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom:
My daughter Sally's horse riding website

-119dBc! - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues. Below are all of the old forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Antennas
-- Circuits & Components
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement

darcyrandall2004
Post subject: -119dBc! Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:47 am

Colonel


Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:16 am
Posts: 46
Hello Its me again,

I was reading an application note that stated that the adjacent channel rejection of a typical pocsag pager was 65dB at +/-25kHz

This places the following restrictions on the phase noise of my paging transmitter:
Assumming a margin of 10dB, the phase noise must be less than or equal to -65dB - 10log(25kHz/1Hz) - 10dB = -119dBc/Hz at 25kHz from the Carrier!

For a PLL, My understanding is that the Output phase noise follows that of the crystal ref for frequencies less than the loop bandwidth and follows that of the VCO for frequencies greater than the loop bandwidth.

Because the channel spacing is 25kHz, I am going to choose a loop bandiwdth << 25kHz/10 to avoid problems with reference spurs. Therefore at 25kHz offset from the carrier, I can assume phase noise output is as a result of the VCO.

Assume I require a VCO that outputs from 440MHz-470MHz. I believe even a state of the art VCO would have trouble achieving -119dBc at 25kHz.

How then are the big boys producing paging transmitters with PLL's that meet these requirements?

Can someone point me in the right direction?
All I can think of is perhaps they:
1. Use multiple small bandwidth VCO's with low phase noise and switch in the right one for the correct frequency.
2. Maybe I can design a low phase noise frequency synth for a lower frequency and then use a mixer with another low noise oscillator to achieve the correct frequency.
3. Perhaps by using a number of PLL's I could assign the last PLL a large channel width, and a large loop bandwidth thereby having the phase noise output still follow the phase noise of a crystal reference.

Do you have any suggestions?
Which approach is typically the easiest and the most common?

Your help is very much appreciated thankyou.

_________________
Regards, Darcy Randall, Perth, Western Australia


Top

yendori
Post subject: Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 11:43 am

General


Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 1:19 am
Posts: 50
Location: texarcana
Is the additional margin really needed? It's my understanding that the phase noise spec @ 35KHz offset is -105dBc/Hz.

I think you can find a VCO to meet this repeatably.

Good Luck,

Rod


Top

darcyrandall2004
Post subject: Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 4:26 am

Colonel


Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:16 am
Posts: 46
If I use two PLL's I can absolutely annihilate the 119dBc requirement.

The first loop has an extremely small bandwidth, hence phase noise in this loop is predominantly a result of the 120MHz Crystal VCO.
The second loop has an extremely large bandwidth, hence phase noise in this loop is attributed to the low noise output from the first loop.



I simulated phase noise using typical values and estimated contribution due to the power supplies.



The problem is either I cant calculate the divider values to achieve 25kHz channel spacings or it is just not possible.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

_________________
Regards, Darcy Randall, Perth, Western Australia


Top

darcyrandall2004
Post subject: Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 7:57 am

Colonel


Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:16 am
Posts: 46
I solved the choice of divider values problem.

If I use the following parameters I just might be able to achieve the -119dBc requirement.

N1=17600
R1=1023
N2=240
R2=2
Xtal Vco ref 2=3.666666MHz
Xtal Vco ref 1=213125Hz

This sets my loop 1 channel bandwidth to 208.3Hz.

Any suggestions?

_________________
Regards, Darcy Randall, Perth, Western Australia


Top

RFDave
Post subject: Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 11:05 am

Captain


Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:14 pm
Posts: 10
Hi:

I've got a couple of comments-

1-10 dB of margin is pretty big, you might want to relax that.
2-Take a look at off the shelf VCO's. I just took a look at Synergy Microwave,
and they have parts that look like they are close to -115 dBc/Hz phase noise
There are quite a few VCO vendors, you might want to look at the ad's here
on rfcafe.
3-You might want to look at packaged VCO/PLL combinations as well.
4-I'd look at Fractional-N PLLs. You lock time with a 200 Hz BW is going to be pretty slow. I'm not sure if a paging transmitter will have the same constraints, but a paging receiver has some pretty stringent lock time requirements to improve battery life.

Dave


Top

darcyrandall2004
Post subject: Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 10:43 pm

Colonel


Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:16 am
Posts: 46
Thanks Dave,

Ive just been looking into fractional synthesizers and I believe they will simply the design.

Cheers

_________________
Regards, Darcy Randall, Perth, Western Australia


Top

RFDave
Post subject: Modulation?Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:18 pm

Captain


Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:14 pm
Posts: 10
How are you planning on doing your modulation for this?

Dave


Top

darcyrandall2004
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:48 pm

Colonel


Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:16 am
Posts: 46
I was going to use a technique called two point modulation where I inject the modulation both on the reference oscillator and the VCO at the same time. I read that this will remove any restrictions the loop bandiwdth places on the baud rate I wish to use.

_________________
Regards, Darcy Randall, Perth, Western Australia




Posted  11/12/2012

Try Using SEARCH to Find What You Need.  >10,000 Pages Indexed on RF Cafe !

Copyright 1996 - 2016
Webmaster:  Kirt Blattenberger, BSEE - KB3UON
Family Websites:  Airplanes and Rockets | Equine Kingdom

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images
and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.