Formulas & Data:
- Electronics
- Mathematics
- Physics
- RF & Microwaves

Parts Vendors:
- all hand-selected

- Amateur Radio
- Vintage Articles:
- Electronics World
- Popular Electronics
- QST
- Radio & TV News
- Radio Craft
- Short Wave Craft
- Wireless World

- Events Calendar
RF Cafe Homepage
Copyright 1999-2015   •−•  ••−•    −•−•  •−  ••−•  •   "RF Cafe" in Morse Code  >> Listen to It <<
- EW & Radar Handbook
- Quizzes       - Software
- App Notes
- Calculators
- Advertise on RF Cafe
- About RF Cafe™
- RF Cafe Shirts & Mugs
- RF Cafe Archives
RF Cafe Book Contest
- RF Cafe on Visit RF Cafe on Facebook Visit RF Cafe on Twitter Visit RF Cafe on LinkedIn
- Tech Humor
- Forums Archive
- Job Board
- Donate to RF Cafe
- Kirt's Cogitations
Custom Search
More than 10,000 searchable pages indexed.
Greetings: There is so much good stuff on RF Cafe that there is no way to list or link to all of it here. Please use the Search box or the Site Map to find what you want - there is a good chance I have it here. Thanks!

Trouble with UPML in FDTD - RF Cafe Forums

Because of the high maintenance needed to monitor and filter spammers from the RF Cafe Forums, I decided that it would be best to just archive the pages to make all the good information posted in the past available for review. It is unfortunate that the scumbags of the world ruin an otherwise useful venue for people wanting to exchanged useful ideas and views. It seems that the more formal social media like Facebook pretty much dominate this kind of venue anymore anyway, so if you would like to post something on RF Cafe's Facebook page, please do.

Below are all of the forum threads, including all the responses to the original posts.


 Post subject: Trouble with UPML in FDTD
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:32 am 
 
Lieutenant

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:27 am
Posts: 1
Hi everyone,

I am currently working on a 3d FDTD code using UPML to truncate the physical domain. Nevertheless, when generating a plane wave (wave vector linear to z), it appears that the wavefront in the UPML becomes quickly angled, which results in large errors at late times. The algorithm I use for source generation is :

IF (Nt.LE.200) THEN
DO J=1,Ny
DO ii=1,Nx
Ex(ii,J,Nz/2)=Ex(ii,J,Nz/2)+(kappax(ii)-I*sigmax(ii)*30./(2.*Pi))/(kappay(j)-I*sigmay(j)*30./(2.*Pi))*(dcos(2.*pi*Nt/30.)+I*dsin(2.*pi*Nt/30.))*dexp(dble(-(Nt-200.)*(Nt-200.)/4000.))
ENDDO
ENDDO
ELSE
DO J=1,Ny
DO II=1,Nx
Ex(II,J,Nz/2)=Ex(II,J,Nz/2)+(kappax(ii)-I*sigmax(ii)*30./(2.*Pi))/(kappay(j)-I*sigmay(j)*30./(2.*Pi))*(dcos(2.*pi*Nt/30.)+I*dsin(2.*pi*Nt/30.))
ENDDO
ENDDO
ENDIF

You can notice that the electric field checks the conservation of the normal component of electric induction D at the interface with UPML. Nevertheless, this does not work well. Did someone experience similar problems with a FDTD code ? How did you solve them ? Thanks very much,

M.



Posted  11/12/2012

Your RF Cafe
Progenitor & Webmaster

Click here to read about RF CafeKirt Blattenberger… single-handedly redefining what an engineering website should be.

View the YouTube RF Cafe Intro Video Carpe Diem!
(Seize the Day!)

5th MOB: My USAF radar shop

Airplanes and Rockets: My personal hobby website

Equine Kingdom: My daughter Sally's horse riding website