The Origin of 73 - RF Cafe Forums

RF Cafe Forums closed its virtual doors in late 2012 mainly due to other social media platforms dominating public commenting venues. RF Cafe Forums began sometime around August of 2003 and was quite well-attended for many years. By 2012, Facebook and Twitter were overwhelmingly dominating online personal interaction, and RF Cafe Forums activity dropped off precipitously. Regardless, there are still lots of great posts in the archive that ware worth looking at. Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts. Here is the full original RF Cafe Forums on Archive.org

-- Amateur Radio

-- Anecdotes, Gripes, & Humor

-- Antennas

-- CAE, CAD, & Software

-- Circuits & Components

-- Employment & Interviews

-- Miscellany

-- Swap Shop

-- Systems

-- Test & Measurement

-- Webmaster

Kirt Blattenberger
 Post subject: The Origin of 73
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:19 am 
 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 2:02 pm

Posts: 878

Location: Erie, PA

Greetings:

As Hams, we routinely use "73" for a closing (or opening) salutation. Here is an excerpt from the QSL.net website that offers an explanation of the origin of "73."

https://www.qsl.net/w5www/73.html#73 (lots of good indo here)

THE ORIGIN OF 73

(Via Louise Ramsey Moreau, W3WRE, & Charles A. Wimer, KC8EHA)

The following is from Louise Ramsey Moreau, W3WRE:

The traditional expression "73" goes right back to the beginning of the landline telegraph days. It is found in some of the earliest editions of the numerical codes, each with a different definition, but each with the same idea in mind - it indicated that the end, or signature, was coming up. But there are no data to prove that any of these were used.

The first authentic use of 73 is in the publication "The National Telegraphic Review and Operators' Guide", first published in April 1857. At that time, 73 meant "My love to you"! Succeeding issues of this publication continued to use this definition of the term. Curiously enough, some of the other numerals used then had the same definition as they have now, but within a short time, the use of 73 began to change.

In the National Telegraph Convention, the numeral was changed from the Valentine-type sentiment to a vague sign of fraternalism. Here, 73 was a greeting, a friendly "word" between operators and it was so used on all wires.

In 1859, the Western Union Company set up the standard "92 Code." A list of numerals from one to 92 was compiled to indicate a series of prepared phrases for use by the operators on the wires. Here, in the 92 Code, 73 changes from a fraternal sign to a very flowery "accept my compliments", which was in keeping with the florid language of that era.

Over the years from 1859 to 1900, the many manuals of telegraphy show variations of this meaning. Dodge's "The Telegraph Instructor" shows it merely as "compliments." The Twentieth Century Manual of Railways and Commercial Telegraphy defines it two ways, one listing as "my compliments to you"; but in the glossary of abbreviations it is merely "compliments". Theodore A. Edison's Telegraphy Self-Taught shows a return of "accept my compliments". By 1908, however, a later edition of the Dodge Manual gives us today's definition of "best regards" with a backward look at the older meaning in another part of the work where it also lists it as "compliments".

"Best regards" has remained ever since as the "put-it-down-in-black-and-white" meaning of 73 but it has acquired overtones of much warmer meaning. Today, amateurs use it more in the manner that James Reid had intended that it be used - a "friendly word between operators".

I hope that this helps you in some way....

73,

Charles A. Wimer

Amateur Radio Call: KC8EHA

Assistant Emergency Coordinator, Trumbull County (OH)

ARRL Official Emergency Station (OH)

_________________

- Kirt Blattenberger :smt024

RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster


 
   
 
Cube Slave
 Post subject: Re: The Origin of 73
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:03 am 
 
Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 10:10 am

Posts: 30

Thanks for that. I didn't know! :thumleft:

Posted  11/12/2012